Fish & freshwater shrimp collections in preparation.

SPECIES DOSSIER · RESEARCH STAGE

Caridina typus

Typical Shrimp

One left-facing Typical Shrimp on black
IUCN LCLeast Concern
About this image

Illustrative or adapted specimen presentation. It is not a documentary photograph of LIMNIC stock, a voucher specimen or evidence of successful breeding.

Scientific references establish the profile’s research context; they do not by themselves establish image ownership or validate the depicted animal.

Media provenance register · Original creator and reuse permissions remain subject to verification where the retained record is incomplete.

Identity and origin

Origin
Sulawesi, Bali, West Papua, Halmahera, Aru and other Indo-Pacific localities
Identity
Widespread amphidromous species complex

A useful grazer with a short rostrum and understated wild pattern. Published phylogeography reveals deeply structured lineages, so the broad name must not erase Indonesian locality or imply that all populations are interchangeable. The established Amano shrimp is Caridina multidentata. Caridina typus is a separate species and should not be sold under that identity.

Before choosing this species

Care-planning notes. Confirm exact requirements for the species and source population.

  • Confirm the adult size and social behaviour of the exact species before planning its aquarium.
  • Establish biological filtration and stable water conditions before introducing animals.
  • Ask for locality, captive history and the actual animal’s feeding record; a catalogue image cannot provide these.
Understand the nitrogen cycle →

Evidence record

Conservation record: Least Concern (LC); assessment year 2011. Conservation source record. This retained reference is an index or secondary record; the direct assessment and date require verification. Check for a newer assessment before making conservation or sourcing decisions.

Catalogue inclusion confirms a research record, not current stock, legal export, or destination-country import permission.

  1. Bernardes et al. (2017), Scientific Reports phylogeography.